As retail model shifts to include data analytics and destination content, are airlines moving fast enough?

March 1, 2013

Ancillary Revenue, IFEC

GuestLogix small 150x150 As retail model shifts to include data analytics and destination content, are airlines moving fast enough?HONG KONG:  The retail model has historically focused on finding new customers, and offering first-timers better promotions and offers than existing members. But the rise of data analytics is shifting that retail model to focus on retaining and better selling to existing customers, ultimately offering better profits and an improved passenger experience.

Some of the most innovative companies like Amazon and Netflix have already embraced data analytics and, by most accounts, are well-regarded by customers. Not so for most airlines, despite the fact that they have a treasure trove of data about passengers, including their travel habits – not to mention the opportunity to keep people captive for a few hours in-flight. At least that’s the view of onboard retail specialist GuestLogix.

During the Airline Retail Conference this week in Hong Kong, GuestLogix positioned itself as having a three-part complementary role to airlines in-flight: distributing destination content, providing analytics of all in-flight sales and doing the processing of on-board transactions.

GuestLogix says that with one airline it recouped US$2.58 million in lost sales, reduced by 10.7% excess inventory and reduced by 20.4% stock-outs. (Simple data analysis: liquor sells better on Thursday than Monday.)

Company CEO Brett Proud is most bullish about the opportunity to sell destination content like ground transportation and city guides, the latter of which he says is one of the most in-demand items not universally sold by airlines. He takes comfort in recently adding Sun Country to GuestLogix’s customer list that also includes KLM, Ryanair and US Airways.

“Destination content was the most important to them,” Proud says of Sun Country. GuestLogix created what is effectively a risk-sharing model by not charging Sun Country unless they earn revenue from the destination content.

But Proud is worried – for airlines’ sakes and his own. More agile travel industries, like hotels, are moving into destination content, expansive mobile applications and also forging relationships with customers. As that grows, airlines risk taking second-place.

The evolution of inflight connectivity is a matter GuestLogix has to reconcile with. Connectivity suppliers have shifted from supplying an Internet connection and relying on that for profits to having portals, facilitated by connectivity, that offer better hopes of returns. Streaming IFE is a big role, but so too is destination content.

In some cases GuestLogix can sell on an airline’s connectivity platform, and there is the option of selling from the gallery cart (but airlines sense already stretched crews would require cajoling), but Proud says airlines are not in complete control of what is sold. It is part of what he senses as connectivity providers over-extending their domain. “Who’s the Wi-Fi provider at Starbucks? It doesn’t matter. It’s plumbing,” he says. But he may be too late with his argument: Gogo for one is a common name around consumer travel website Jaunted, and Gogo even re-branded a few years ago with the explicit purpose to be more recognised by end users.

share save 171 16 As retail model shifts to include data analytics and destination content, are airlines moving fast enough?
, , , , , ,

About Will Horton

Originally from New York City - now lives in Hong Kong. An active follower of the air transport industry interested in how the Asia-Pacific region's emerging airlines are addressing the passenger experience given their high-fuelled growth. Will also writes for the Centre for Aviation. He previously worked for Flightglobal.

View all posts by Will Horton
advert

2 Responses to “As retail model shifts to include data analytics and destination content, are airlines moving fast enough?”

  1. Mark Lange Says:

    Thanks for the article! I enjoyed the read! I had a thought and wanted to share to see what the feedback would be; with reference to Starbucks and other like them, I felt they wanted to control the customer experience from the time you walked in the door tell you drag yourself away. Hopefully buying more stuff while you are there. It seemed to me that the airlines did not (or better do not) what to be any part of this model and want Gogo and others to bear the brunt of the internet experience while in flight. So my question is more in parts; 1) am I correct in the feeling about the airlines not wanting any part of the internet experience? 2.) is it too late for them to seek controlling the internet experience and making our over all experience better as we travel on the airline? I for one look for the service. I do not like the prices! But I need to get work done. Where I think the airlines are missing the next step is in-seat power on longer flights of 2 hours and better tray tables! If I am off on what I see please let me know.
    Mark

    Reply

  2. Will Horton Says:

    You’re very right, Mark, that in-seat power is too often missing from the equation.

    To address your first question by asking a question(!): do the airlines not want control of their connectivity portal, or do they not have the time and resources to properly manage it?

    Reply

Leave a Reply